Times are tough. Clients are looking for ways to cut costs. In this climate, pricing is one of the hardest conversations designers have with clients.

When times get tough, brand investment is often one of the first things questioned. The client’s assumption is simple: if we stop spending on branding, marketing or communications for a while, nothing much will change.

The evidence suggests otherwise.

Researchers at the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science at Adelaide University tracked 41 brands that stopped investing in brand advertising for a year or more.
The results were sobering.

Sales declined by an average of 16% in the first year.
By the second year, the decline had reached 25%.
By the third year, sales were down 36%.

For designers, this creates an important opportunity to shift the conversation. Instead of discussing the cost of a brand project, discuss the cost of doing nothing.ost, gives them a range to react to, and starts the budget conversation from expertise, not guesswork.Here’s what we’ve learned from over a decade mentoring Australian designers

Questions to ask your client

Ask clients:

“If you stopped investing in your brand for 18 months, what would happen to your ability to attract new customers?”
“What would happen to your ability to justify our pricing?”
“What would happen to awareness, trust and preference in the market?”
“If we apply the the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute findings where would your sales be in year one, two and three.”

These are business questions, not design questions. They take a data driven approach.

As Kathryn McArthur, Consumer & Shopper Insights Manager at Colgate-Palmolive, observed:

Having data-driven marketing principles is like turning on a light in a darkened room. A lot of the furniture isn’t where you imagined it, but now the arrangement makes considerably more sense..

Design is not a discretionary spend

The reality is, strong brands help organisations maintain visibility, build memory structures, create trust and support pricing power. When investment stops, those advantages gradually erode. Competitors continue to invest, customers forget, and acquisition becomes harder and more expensive.

This is why design should not be positioned as a discretionary expense. It is an investment in future demand.

The next time a client focuses on the cost of design, help them consider the alternative.

The real question is not: “Can we afford to invest in our brand?”

It is: “What will it cost us if we don’t?”

As always, happy to discuss further, just email Greg

Greg Branson

Want more insights like this? Subscribe below. (And tell your friends )
The Design Business Review is Australia’s only online design management magazine.
It’s professional development information written specifically for Australian designers by Australian designers. Best of all, it’s free.

Greg Branson

Most business consultants come from a finance background. That’s where I differ. My background is firmly in the creative space. I have degrees in photography and education and my extra-curricula love is a dark room, analogue photography and vintage cameras – a money pit if ever there was.

That’s why my interest in the business of design. Carol and I loved running a design studio but were adamant it was a commercial business and our energies should be well-rewarded. I started research into working smarter not harder early in my career.

Since then I’ve sat with hundreds of Australian creative business owners and discussed what’s working and what’s not. I understand the practicalities of a studio, and have empathy for the challenges but I know good profit margins are attainable.

Always happy to chat, I can be contacted here.

Previous
Previous

3 questions guaranteed to give useless answers

Next
Next

Evidence-based design